Those Wacky Atheists!

	Duration: 06:30 minutes Upload Time: 07-08-22 00:51:59 User: paleocrat :::: Favorites :::: Top Videos of Day
Description: A video recap of the atheist comments regarding me and my opposition to atheism and evolution.
Comments
gnosisandlight ::: Favorites There is no way for the value of accumulated knowledges to be quantified by a naturalistic method, because the focal point of the question is ethereal by nature. MN, as created by Hume, has no capacity to pass its own test. 07-09-08 17:38:39 __________________________________________________
gnosisandlight ::: Favorites Not really bitbutter. The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence. You cannot really say, "i don't see another way" and have that statement constitute a method to disprove the thing unseen. To boot MN itself quantifies itself as the "only" way to accumulate knowledge, not your more sensible "it is simply better than other ways". 07-09-08 17:35:12 __________________________________________________
gnosisandlight ::: Favorites "It makes them wrong. " OK please detail, specifically, how quantum theory makes the assertion that "all Cretans are liars" wrong. Be very specific. Focus like a laser beam. Quantum theory disproves Parmenide's doctrine, not Zeno's paradox. It is not a disprovable thing. 07-09-08 17:28:12 __________________________________________________
gnosisandlight ::: Favorites CAN be observed, or measured doesn't mean that that is how said knowledge IS accumulated. Mac. As I explained before knowledge can be accumulated via logic, or math, without any appeal to naturalism. 07-09-08 17:24:22 __________________________________________________
bitbutter ::: Favorites "There is no naturalistic way to show that MN is the only reliable way to build knowledge." Perhaps i'm not understanding the problem fully but wouldn't an assessment of the usefulness of the models generated by MN constitute a naturalistic way to approach showing that MN is a more reliable source of knowledge than other sources? 07-09-07 05:27:22 __________________________________________________
macman13 ::: Favorites "Um... You understand that we are not talking about Parmenides' doctrine right. What does quantum theory or any of Max Plank's work have to do with Zeno's assertion that all?" It makes them wrong. 07-09-07 03:29:06 __________________________________________________
macman13 ::: Favorites "Sure. The example of the Zooks and Zinks..... and math. How is finding the vertex of a quadragraph MN?" Because you can MEASURE a quadrigraph, it can be observed, studied, understood, theorems can be formulated based on it's characteristics, it can be touched/seen, etc. 07-09-07 03:27:41 __________________________________________________
gnosisandlight ::: Favorites "Show me ONE example of someone building knowledge by any other method." Sure. The example of the Zooks and Zinks..... and math. How is finding the vertex of a quadragraph MN? Logical examples are not dependant on MN. But the best evidence id MN not being up to the task itself. 07-09-07 02:52:22 __________________________________________________
gnosisandlight ::: Favorites Try and reconcile the statement Mac. You are saying it is true, I am simply saying that that cannot be shown, in fact MN cannot even meet its own standard. 07-09-07 02:46:53 __________________________________________________
gnosisandlight ::: Favorites Um... You understand that we are not talking about Parmenides' doctrine right. What does quantum theory or any of Max Plank's work have to do with Zeno's assertion that all Cretans are liars. We are not talking about the idea that Change is an illusion which is what you addressed. 07-09-07 02:44:08 __________________________________________________