Re: Are There Two Accounts of Creation?

	Duration: 08:11 minutes Upload Time: 07-06-05 01:23:20 User: KingHeathen :::: Favorites :::: Top Videos of Day
Description: WOW! That's a long way to go to try and combine two SEPARATE books written by DIFFERENT authors...but ok...here are your biggest flaws.
Comments
Anxagoras ::: Favorites Do you know what is the great deep, or the waters in genesis 1:2?, was that part of heaven?, or is it some sort of dry land?. Also what does it mean the earth was without form?. You create something yet it has no form?, I think this parallels with hebrews 11:3 07-08-27 02:27:36 __________________________________________________
KingHeathen ::: Favorites You can twist the words if you choose, but for 2 millenia, that was never taught...it's not until now that so many people are being allowed to publicly debunk the Bible that these "excuses" are coming out. "Of the field" is fairly obviously referring to things we eat vs trees and bushes...God needed a man to "toil the fields"...then comes the plants of the fields 07-07-30 10:55:35 __________________________________________________
Mohabias ::: Favorites Actually, genesis 2:5 says that no "shrub of the field" nor " plant of the field" had yet been created, the field is a specific term, which could be meaning the garden location, not referring to the whole earth. The type of plant and shrub "field plant and shrub" could also be referring to a specific type of shrub and plant. Also, it takes place within day 6, not after everything. 07-07-29 23:16:32 __________________________________________________
KingHeathen ::: Favorites very true...thanks for pointing that out DYkurama. 07-06-22 15:17:24 __________________________________________________
DYkurama ::: Favorites Some creationists say that the first account is the real creation and the second is just limited to the creations that took place in and around the garden, however, Genesis 2:5 states that nothing had yet been created on the entire earth, thus making the two accounts separate. 07-06-22 11:54:02 __________________________________________________
gracebass ::: Favorites Ok, if you think so. 07-06-17 22:37:50 __________________________________________________
KingHeathen ::: Favorites sorry, not buying it. We know that the books of Genesis were pieced together from several different writers and the most logical answer is simply that one writer wrote it one way and another writer wrote it another way. 07-06-17 18:01:34 __________________________________________________
gracebass ::: Favorites The fact that it's mentioned as "every" is irrelavent. What make the difference is 1:21, "every winged fowl AFTER HIS KIND and 2:19, "every fowl OF THE AIR." In the original creation (1:21) God made many birds from the water to reproduce (after his kind), in 2:19 God made every bird of the air (one bird of each kind) so Adam could name them along with the other land animals. 07-06-17 10:23:12 __________________________________________________
KingHeathen ::: Favorites if you don't see how saying that EVERY bird was created and then MORE birds were created is a contradiciton...then yes, we will never agree. 07-06-16 22:35:22 __________________________________________________
gracebass ::: Favorites Sorry, I don't see a contradiction. I see that two times God created birds, on day 5 & in the Garden of Eden on day 6. 07-06-16 16:24:39 __________________________________________________